News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 

US-Mexico sugar talks seen deadlocked

By Rene Pastor
August 9, 2000
 

STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, Colo., Aug 9 (Reuters) - U.S. sugar industry officials said Wednesday talks between the U.S. and Mexico over sweetener trade have shown little movement so far, and negotiations may run into September before a deal is hammered out.

The chief negotiator for the U.S., Greg Frazier, and Mexican Trade Undersecretary Luis de la Calle told delegates from the U.S. sugar industry attending the 17th annual Sweetener Symposium on Tuesday they were in the final stages of the talks, but gaps remained between the two sides.

"There appears to be a lot of gamesmanship involved. The U.S. officials have told us that there have been no proposals so far that could be seen as substantial. I think it will not be until the middle of September before we see some movement in these talks," a sugar beet farmer said.

Several U.S. sugar industry officials said Mexico, which has warned it will ask for the formation of a trade dispute panel under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) over the issue, has moved its deadline several times.

"So far, they're like two ships passing each other in the night," a U.S. sugar cane farmer said, adding he expects more substantial talks to be held close to the Oct 1 date when Washington normally announces its annual sugar import quota.
Some delegates were not entirely encouraged by the tenor of the discussions after listening to the two officials.

"The question is will they have the will, both here and in Mexico, to successfully end the talks," another sugar beet farmer said. He said the careful hedging by the two officials when asked to describe how close they were to a deal was "not an encouraging sign."

Frazier, who spoke in a teleconference call from Washington, said both sides must "find the wherewithal to bridge the gaps that remain" between the two countries.

"I don't believe we have bridged the gap yet," added Frazier.

Another U.S. sugar farmer said one got the impression both sides were trying hard to clinch an agreement, but the two cannot seem to find a way to reach a compromise arrangement to settle their simmering dispute.

Mexico has argued it is entitled under NAFTA to ship an estimated surplus of 600,000 tonnes of sugar starting in the seventh year of the agreement, which is due to start on Oct 1.

The U.S. says a side-letter to NAFTA, which U.S. legislators say was vital to secure Congressional approval of the deal, only guarantees up to 250,000 tonnes of duty-free access for Mexican sugar. Further U.S. calculations pegged the amount to around 110,000-120,000 tonnes.

The negotiations are complicated by the unresolved issue over high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), for which Mexico slapped an anti-dumping duty that sparked a trade dispute with its powerful northern neighbor. Mexico has until Sept 22 to tell Washington how it intends to comply with a ruling by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which ruled that Mexico violated trade rules by imposing anti-dumping duties on HFCS without first determining that there had been injury to domestic producers.

Jeff Lang, legal counsel of the industry group American Sugar Alliance, said the better approach would be if the two countries take solid steps "to see what they can do to move to a common market" on sweeteners which NAFTA mandates must be in place by 2008.

Frazier said even if an agreement is reached on the current dispute, it may run into "a lot of skepticism" from Americans who have seen Mexico dismiss the side letter which secured NAFTA approval in the early 1990s.

Rep. Larry Combest (R-Texas), chairman of the House Agriculture committee, said earlier in the conference the side-letter "has been violated continuously" and that future support for trade agreements depends on adherence to such side- letters.

Rep. Charles Stenholm (D-Texas), the ranking Democrat on the same agriculture panel in the House, told delegates here on Tuesday "it's not going to do anyone any good" if the side agreement with Mexico is not honored.

The stakes are high for both sides.

Since NAFTA went into effect in the U.S. on Jan 1, 1994, Mexico has become the second biggest U.S. trade partner behind only Canada. According to de la Calle, U.S.-Mexican trade has expanded by 15 percent annually to reach $250 billion in 1999 while trade between the U.S. and Japan has grown by only 3-4 percent per annum to reach $190 billion last year.

"We have surpassed Japan in a very substantial way," he said.

"I do hope we can find a way to come up with an agreement prior to the start of the marketing year (on Oct 1)," said Frazier, adding a bitter result of the talks may have a corrosive impact on U.S.-Mexican ties.

"They're trying to put their best face on it, but they still have a lot of hard bargaining to get through," a U.S. farmer said.