News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 

Growers: Block Mexican sugar

By Jill Rush, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
August 20, 2000
 

Local sugar representatives are adamant on this point: Until the issue is settled, no Mexican sugar should be allowed to enter the United States.

Friday was a day for tough talk from the U.S. sugar industry, a day after Mexico unexpectedly broke off talks with U.S. negotiators over surplus sugar limits and said it would seek intervention from a NAFTA arbitration panel.
Mexico says the North American Free Trade Agreement stipulates that it can send all its excess sugar -- about 600,000 tons -- to the United States beginning Oct. 1. American trade officials say a side provision of the accord limits Mexican sugar imports to 110,000 to 120,000 tons.

U.S. growers fear a flood of Mexican sugar would overwhelm the already glutted U.S. sugar market, which is reeling under a one-two punch of overproduction and rock-bottom prices. The federal government already has bought 130,000 tons of surplus U.S. sugar in a so-far unsuccessful attempt to give the market a lift.

"It certainly was Mexico's decision to break off the talks," said Carolyn Cheney, Washington representative for the Sugar Cane Growers of Florida, a cooperative based in Belle Glade. "And we don't believe any sugar should or will come in if they have chosen to go ahead with this NAFTA panel."

The cooperative announced plans this year to forfeit its sugar to pay back federal loans. Sugar prices this week were a little over 18 cents a pound, shy of the 19.5 cents growers say is necessary to avoid forfeiture.
The American Sugar Alliance, which represents the industry throughout Florida and around the United States, echoed the Belle Glade group's rhetoric.

"Our position is that no sugar comes in until we have this settled. And that's just the way we see it," said Joseph Terrell, the Washington-based group's public relations director.

Brendan Daly, a spokesman with the Washington office of U.S. Trade Representative Charlene Barshefsky, said Friday that officials had not decided whether the United States would block the Mexican sugar pending the outcome of the NAFTA panel's ruling.

A decision from that yet-to-be-named NAFTA panel, which would include two U.S. and two Mexican representatives, probably would not be made before Oct. 1.

Judy Sanchez, spokeswoman for U.S. Sugar in Clewiston, said the dispute isn't likely to have an immediate effect on local growers, although they are closely watching the situation.

"It's unfortunate that Mexico's not abiding by the conditions they agreed to in NAFTA," Sanchez said Friday, adding that it would be in the best interest of both countries to settle the issue as quickly and fairly as possible.

Sanchez said it is doubtful U.S. Sugar will forfeit the 50 tons of sugar it has produced under a government loan program, because the amount is only a minor portion of the 850,000 tons the company produced this past season.
Comments from officials with Palm Beach-based Florida Crystals, Florida's other major sugar producer, were unavailable Friday.

At a news conference Thursday in Mexico, the country's deputy commerce minister, Luis de la Calle, threatened to eventually target duty-free imports of U.S. corn if the United States doesn't raise its sugar quota Oct. 1.
The Mexican sugar industry, which urged its government to request the NAFTA dispute panel, also has called on the Commerce Ministry to block duty-free U.S. corn imports, used to produce high-fructose corn syrup.

Bill Kramer, general manager of the Sugar Cane Growers of Florida, said the breakdown of the talks is troubling.
"I think this is the beginning of a test to see if you really can work out a trade negotiation with Mexico," Kramer said. "There are issues here as to how much credibility any negotiator has in working out a trade issue."

Mexico's sudden pullout puts more pressure on the NAFTA panel and negotiators to reach a consensus, he said.
"This is destroying the faith on the NAFTA level," Kramer said. "If you can't overcome the trust issue, you're kind of back to square one."