News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 

How does the government handle the sugar program?

By Mikkel Pates, Agweek Staff Writer
September 26, 2000
 

The federal government plays a huge role in how the sugar program works and doesn't.

Last fall, the U.S. Department of Agriculture was criticized for delaying announcing the year's import quotas and was blamed for depressing prices by causing uncertainty in the market.

Since then, USDA has been applying a series of bandages to a hemorrhaging industry:

In March, the government announced it would buy up to 150,000 tons of sugar to save $6 million in "administrative costs" the government would incur in loan forfeitures.

The industry lobbied for a 370,000-ton purchase and called the government's action inadequate to improve prices so that forfeitures wouldn't be necessary. USDA bought only 132,000 tons of sugar for $54.1 million.

In July, the government announced a "payment-in-kind" program. They would give farmers "PIK" certificates in exchange for destroying some healthy beet acres to keep the surplus pile under control. As of last week, about 104,000 acres were reported to have been accepted into the program, of which about 35,000 acres are from the Red River Valley.

Sept. 15, the USDA allowed sugar companies to forfeit sugar collateral to pay off government loans, something that wasn't supposed to happen if more than 1.5 million tons of sugar is imported. Allowing the companies to pay back loans with sugar, not money, cost taxpayers an estimated $100 million, critics say.

In the announcement, the government set Mexico's "entitlement" at 106,000 tons of refined sugar for the year. That's less than Mexico thought it was entitled to, and it's unclear whether the country will be allowed to export that amount into the United States until the sugar dispute is settled, according to industry analysts.

'Rationalization' 

How many weeks can the sugar industry take like the past two? 

Plant closings are called "rationalization" in the business world. 

In the past week, the Amfac/JMB company announced it would shut down sugar plantations on Kaua'i in mid-November, eliminating 400 jobs -- half of the ag jobs on the Hawaiian island. 

Gay & Robinson's Olokele Plantation is the sole survivor of what once were nine sugar companies on the island. 

Two days earlier, on the island of Maui, Hawaiian Commercial and Sugar Co., shut down a mill, blaming poor prices and an extended drought. The closing cuts 75 jobs leaves Alexander and Baldwin's Puunene Mill as the sole survivor. 

Sept. 8, U.S. Sugar Corp., cut 217 full-time and 110 seasonal workers in a "top-to-bottom shake-up" to save $20 million. The company employs 3,500 workers in Clewiston, Fla. Clewiston has 6,500 residents and an unemployment rate of 20 percent. U.S. Sugar is a partner with American Crystal Sugar Co., Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative and Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative of Renville, Minn. 

Imperial Holly closed two beet refineries in northern California, serving 250 growers and providing 400 full-time factory jobs. The former Spreckles mills will reduce 275,000 tons of refined beet sugar. 

Faced with an uncertain future, Rocky Mountain Sugar Growers, a four-state sugar cooperative formed in July to try to study whether to make an offer on six Western Sugar Co. factories they supply with beets. The plants employ 650 full-time and 980 seasonal people. 

Western, owned by Tate and Lyle, officials told growers they're "re-evaluating their options" and are entertaining purchase offers. Nearly 1,100 growers in Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming and Montana are considering buying the plants. 

Unclear is how they'll fund a purchase the plants in a time of low profits in sugar and an uncertain future. The plants were built in the early 1900s run about half the capacity that plants do in the Red River Valley.