News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 

Sugar producers to default on loans again today ago

By Jennifer Sergent, Washington Correspondent
September 30, 2000
 
WASHINGTON - For the second time in a month, Florida's sugar producers are expected to default on more than $85 million worth of government loans when they come due today.
But the three producers won't be financially liable. Under their government loan program, they will simply transfer ownership of more than 238,000 tons of sugar to the government on Monday.

The sugar industry has suffered from low prices for a year due to bumper crops at home and foreign imports on top. The last time sugar was turned over to the government was in 1985.
Producers have traditionally benefited from a protective program that keeps prices high by restricting imports. But so many U.S. farmers have started growing sugar for the good prices that not even restricted imports can keep them all flush.

U.S. Sugar Corp. in Clewiston is expected to announce on Monday that it's giving up 35,000 tons of sugar worth $12.6 million. Florida Crystals in Palm Beach will give up 103,651 tons worth $37.3 million. And the Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative in Belle Glade is expected to forfeit about 100,000 tons worth $36 million, although figures were not firm as of Friday night.

"Obviously, turning sugar over is a last resort," said Judy Sanchez, spokeswoman for U.S. Sugar.

Producers must pay a penny per pound of forfeited sugar as a penalty, she said. The company has already laid off 327 full-time and seasonal employees due to the hard economic times.
The first loans for the 2000 growing season were due Aug. 30. The Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative and Florida Crystals forfeited 47,000 tons of sugar worth $17 million. Across the country, the defaults so far amount to about $57 million.

On the latest round of loans due today, the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates between $100 million and $200 million worth of debt will go bad.

All that money not being repaid represents a huge loss to taxpayers, say critics of the sugar program. And that will give them ammunition to end the pro gram, since its big defense has always been the fact that it never cost the taxpayers anything.

"What is changing now and is forever gone is the most potent argument," said Jeff Nedelman, spokesman for the Coalition for Sugar Reform in Washington.

Nedelman mocked the producers' common refrain about their import-restricting program: "It's true. This program does not cost the American taxpayers a penny. It now costs them about $250 million."

Sugar industry officials argue that the costs of sugar programs are minimal compared to U.S. aid to other crops, such as wheat, corn and rice.

"The support to the rest of agriculture is estimated at over $32 billion this year, none of which is going to sugar," said Jack Roney, a senior economist with the American Sugar Alliance in Washington.

"(The sugar forfeitures) are still just a fraction of the support going to other producers."
Starting Monday, the USDA will take most of the sugar it now owns and give it to sugar beet growers in the Midwest to sell, in exchange for them plowing under about 100,000 acres of their sugar crops this year to further reduce the supply.

The agency also took sugar off market in May, when it paid $54 million to growers to take 132,000 pounds out of circulation.

Those actions, in addition to all the sugar being let go this weekend, will return the market to higher prices, said Dalton Yancey, a lobbyist for the Florida sugar cane producers.
The price per pound of sugar went from just over 19 cents on Sept. 22 to 19.6 cents on Friday, according to the Coffee, Sugar and Cocoa Exchange in New York.

The increase reflects expectations of the sugar forfeits, said Sanchez of U.S. Sugar.

But any recovery that might happen this year will be temporary, Yancey said, because the causes behind low prices haven't gone away. They include too much sugar at home, an expected surge of imports from Mexico this year, and sugar syrup that's being imported from Canada outside of the normal import restrictions.

"We're still in the soup, and fundamental problems still exist," he said.