LONDON, United Kingdom, October 10, 2000 (ENS) -
Biotechnology company Aventis admitted Monday that it had grown
genetically modified sugar beet without permission at two trial sites in
the United Kingdom.
Canola, or oil rapeseed, is often genetically modified. It shows up on
the grocery shelves as cooking oil and in baked goods. (Photo by
Ian Britton, courtesy http://Freefoto.com.)
The company told the UK environment ministry that during routine
destruction of the crops, it discovered a "tiny" amount - 0.5
percent - of unauthorized genetically modified (GM) beet line.
"Aventis informed the government after discovering a background
level of a second, unauthorized, herbicide tolerant GM beet line as part
of the routine destruction of the crops," said a statement issued by
the Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
"The company used this batch of GM seed at 10 small trial sites in
England this spring. Only two of the sites showed evidence of the
unauthorized seed. The trials are now finished and the sites have been
cleared of all GM plant material," continued the statement.
The ministry referred the matter to the Advisory Committee on Releases
in to the Environment, which has advised that there is no threat to human
health or the environment. But Aventis, already at the center of a public
hearing over GM crops, faces investigation and possible prosecution by the
government's Central Science Laboratory.
The laboratory performs statutory inspections of trial sites and acts
as the government's enforcement team on any releases of GM crops. Its
preliminary report into this latest incident is expected next week.
Genetic modification involves altering an organism's genetic code or
DNA in a way that does not occur naturally by mating or natural
recombination. Genetic engineering allows selected individual genes to be
transferred from one organism into another, sometimes between non-related
species.
This technology is routinely used in thousands of research laboratories
worldwide and has resulted in many new products and processes such as
industrial enzymes and medicines such as insulin and vaccines.
But the use of genetic modification in agriculture and the food
industry is currently the focus of intense public and political debate.
Consumers, environmentalists and some scientists worry about risks to
human health and the environment. Among their concerns are that GM crops
could cause toxic or allergenic effects and large scale elimination of
indigenous agricultural and natural species.
For that reason, the UK government has embarked upon the Farm Scale
Evaluations, a three year program, which will provide information about
what effects growing and managing GM crops might have on wildlife.
But the 10 trial sites set up by Aventis were not part of these
evaluations. "This research is over and above the existing regulatory
framework, which has already ensured that these GM crops are safe for
human health and the environment," said yesterday's ministry
statement.
Soybeans, one of the most frequently modified foods, are used in many
health foods such as soy milk and tofu. (Photo by Scott Bauer)
Aventis GM beet trial falls under the UK's small scale research and
development consent known as Part B. Part B rules stipulate that the crop,
in this case GM beet, is not allowed to flower, therefore no GM pollen can
be produced and no cross pollination can take place.
Part B consent also means that the crop cannot enter the food or feed
chain, and trial sites are monitored intensively for two years.
Aventis is currently in the middle of public hearing into its
application to have Chardon LL, a GM fodder maize, added to the UK's
National Seed List. Inclusion on the list would allow Chardon LL to be
grown commercially but environmental group Friends of the Earth has
challenged the application.
Last week the company was warned that its application may fail if it
refused to give evidence at the public hearing.
"The Friends of the Earth representation contains a considerable
number of questions in relation to the soundness of any potential decision
to add Chardon LL to the national list, which as a straightforward matter
of fact are in no way at all answered in the Aventis written
representations," said Alun Alesbury, the senior Barrister chairing
the hearing.
Alesbury said that unless he could be persuaded that all objections not
covered by Aventis' written submission are irrelevant, then "I will
have had to report to Ministers that there are numerous points of
objection which were not addressed in Aventis' original submissions and
which have not been answered at all by evidence at the Hearing."
"Unless Ministers are persuaded that all points are irrelevant,
how can they [Aventis] conceive that Ministers can make a decision
favourable to their application," he continued. Aventis should
"think carefully on the stance they are adopting" or face the
"almost inevitable consequences of that stance," said Alesbury. |