News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 

Mexico defends import duties on U.S. corn sweetener

By Pav Jordan
October 24, 2000
 
MEXICO CITY, Oct 23 (Reuters) - Mexican trade officials said Monday that anti-dumping duties on U.S. imports of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) were fair and legal, and questioned renewed calls from the United States for a World Trade Organisation investigation.

``The WTO told us to review our policies (on Jan 14), and we were able to ratify the validity of the duties,'' a Trade Ministry Official told Reuters, referring to a Sept 20 decision by the government. ``That is Mexico's official position, Mexico has responded.''

Mexico and the U.S. are caught up in an often acrimonious, parry-and-thrust debate over the exchange of sugar and corn syrup across their shared, 2,000-mile border.

Mexico says a rise in HFCS imports from the United States since 1996 harmed its local sugar producers, depressing sales, raising industry unemployment and leaving some sugar refineries virtually listing.

High fructose corn syrup has displaced sugar as the key sweetener used in Mexico's enormous soft-drink industry, cutting the sugar industry stake in what growers say is a fundamental market.

On Monday, U.S. trade ambassador Rita Hayes told a meeting of the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) in Geneva that Mexico's duties were in violation of free trade rules and asked the global trade watchdog to investigate.

``We responded to this issue finally on Sept 20,'' the Mexican spokesman said, referring to Mexico's official ratification of the two-year-old anti-dumping duties on imports of the corn syrup.

The September decision, published in Mexico's Diario Official, or Federal Gazette, said a careful investigation of WTO and U.S. concerns revealed anti-dumping measures to be fair.

Duties on U.S. imports of high fructose corn syrup range from $55.37 to $175.50 per metric ton, with companies like the Archer Daniels Midland Co. (NYSE:ADM - news), the largest U.S. grain processor, paying the least and companies like agricultural giant Cargill Inc. paying the most.

``It was determined that in the period between Jan 1 and Dec 31 of 1996, national producers were threatened by the rise in imports of high fructose corn syrup from the United States,'' the decision said.

THE SUGAR DEBATE

Mexican sugar producers may have reason for concern as a related debate over how much sugar it can export to the United States under North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) rules was stalled as it was going against the Mexican interest.

The United States has limited the Mexican sugar quota to 116,000 metric tons in the 2001 season while Mexico feels it is entitled to export more than five times that, or the roughly 600,000 tons that make up its surplus. U.S. producers fear the local sugar market would be flooded if authorities allowed the import of the entire Mexican surplus.

Mexico said in August it would take the issue before a NAFTA arbitration panel and sporadic talks since then have been unsuccessful.

Mexico, the No. 8 sugar producer, is desperately seeking markets for its sugar and would prefer to export to the United States where it would receive a better price for the commodity than on world markets.

The Dominican Republic, Brazil and the Philippines are to receive the largest share of the U.S. sugar tariff-rate quota in 2001.