COURTLAND, Calif. (AP) -- When farmer John Baranek talks
about the economic disaster looming over California's small and family
farms, the frustration and anger are obvious in his voice.
Baranek, a third-generation Sacramento Valley farmer who runs a
525-acre wine grape vineyard with his wife, Catherine, describes a world
in which family farms are being gobbled up by giant corporations, unfairly
squeezed out of the market by poor-quality, government subsidized imports
and increasingly beset by a Byzantine codex of regulatory nightmares.
"America demands that we farm clean and produce the highest
quality food under the most strict standards in the world, and now we have
our corporations buying crops from foreign countries using pesticides we
banned 20 years ago," Baranek said.
The biggest disaster, Baranek said, is that the nation's family farmers
have been cast into the uncertainty of a world market at a time when
commodity prices are dropping and agricultural processors and retail
chains are consolidating at a rapid clip. Farmers are increasingly faced
with the decision to either sell their produce at prices below production
costs or simply let their crops rot in the fields.
"I got sick and tired of all my neighbors crying at the coffee
shop," Baranek said.
The Baraneks and a handful of Central Valley growers have formed The
Coalition to Save the Family Farm to lobby elected officials and alert the
public to the impending "agricultural depression" facing family
farmers.
Small farms are difficult to define and some family farms are quite
large, but the coalition is generally worried about growers who aren't
vertically integrated -- farmers who don't own packing houses, trucking
lines, storage facilities or wholesale distributorships.
In California, farms grossing below $250,000 a year account for 84
percent of the roughly 37,000 growers but generate only $2.3 billion of
the state's $27 billion agricultural economy, according to the Division of
Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of California, Davis
and the state Economic Development Department.
Between 1992 and 1997, more than 3,000 small farms were incorporated
into larger organizations, sold to developers or simply shut down, the
university reported.
"This is actually not a cycle that agriculture is going through.
This is going to be a severe depression," Catherine Baranek said.
Many industry observers agree and say the factory-farming trend that's
prevailed in America since the 1950s is killing small and family farms.
Farmers have become increasingly reliant on growing and business
strategies that require more and more investments in transportation,
marketing, fertilizers, pesticides and fossil fuels, said Jim Tischer,
chief of the nonprofit group Community Alliance with Family Farmers in
Davis.
"By and large, mainly because of vertical integration in
agriculture, farmers at the lower end of the economic hierarchy have not
shared in the boom in the U.S. economy since 1990," Tischer said.
"They've been left out on the back stoop," Tischer said.
Consolidation in other sectors of the economy have also been cutting
into farmers' bottom line.
Nationwide, the 20 largest supermarket chains controlled 52 percent of
all grocery store sales last year, according to Roberta Cook, a marketing
economist at UC Davis.
That trend, combined with the steady decline of wholesale markets --
there are only 22 major markets nationally that control about 35 percent
of the total fresh fruit and vegetable output-- means that farmers have
fewer places to sell their crops and less leverage when negotiating
prices, Cook said.
"In 1900, the farmer got 41 cents of the consumer's food dollar
and in 2000, the farmer gets about 9 cents," Tischer said.
Added to California growers' worries is the alarming failure of several
high volume processing plants and cooperatives in the state over the last
few years, most of which are blamed on overproduction and foreign
competition.
The state's anemic sugar beet industry is a perfect example how
international trade agreements are driving domestic farmers into
bankruptcy, said fifth generation Sacramento Valley farmer Topper Van
Loben Sels.
California's sugar beet farmers, who once produced a year-round supply
for nine refineries scattered from the Imperial Valley to the Oregon
border, are looking for other crops to plant as two of the state's four
remaining sugar processing plants plan to close this winter.
Overproduction nationwide has been driving prices down for much of the
1990s. Since 1995 prices have dropped about 30 percent to $22 per 100
pounds of refined sugar -- an 18-year low. A fourth of that decline has
hit since December 1999.
But Van Loben Sels, who grows sugar beets, wine grapes, pears, tomatoes
and feed grain, says the amount of sugar being imported from Mexico under
the NAFTA agreement is roughly equal to the volume of sugar produced by
California's failing refineries.
"We've lived through bad markets, bad weather and depressions but
those are short term problems. The government is cutting long-term trade
deals that are going to put our producers out of business," Van Loben
Sels said.
"They're creating additional supply with no additional
demand," he said.
Also, it costs money to protect the environment and comply with state
and federal labor laws, farmers say.
"If the public is going to demand all this stuff, let them pay for
it. All this environmental stuff is coming out of our pocket, not the
consumer's," said John Baranek.
"It's just a matter of time and family farms are going to be
history," he said. |