News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 
Group grapples with a dilemma
By Rona K. Johnson, Grand Forks Herald
May 16, 2011
 

The Grand Forks County Commission has been grappling with a difficult issue: whether to allow sugar beet tailings and pulp to be spread on a 140-acre plot of land north of Grand Forks.

Tom Brule, a Minnesota farmer who owns Thomas Brule Trucking LLC, applied for a special-use permit so he could deposit beet tailings and pulp on the land. Brule had permission from the landowner, but he also needed an OK from the Grand Forks County Commission.

In order for the special permit to be passed, the commission has provided Brule with a list of restrictions. One of the restrictions is that Brule would be able to dump tailings and pulp on that site for only one year. If residents in the area had complaints, Brule would not be able to use the site again.

The beet tailings and pulp are byproducts from the American Crystal Sugar Co.'s sugar processing facility in East Grand Forks. The company tries to sell all of the tailings and pulp that it can, said Joel Smith, the manager of the Regulatory Affairs Department at American Crystal.

"Most of the time we make it into pellets and sell it as cattle feed," he said. "We have no interest in just throwing this on the ground."

But the company is slicing more beets than it formerly did, and there is always a fair amount of the tailings and pulp to dispose of, he said.

Any pulp and tailings that cannot be made into pellets or fed to livestock are spread on the ground in the winter and tilled under the soil in the spring.

"The practice of dumping sugar beet pulp and tailings on farmland isn't something brand new," said Morris Davidson, Grand Forks County extension agent. "Farmers have been using the beet processing byproducts to fertilize their fields for many years. Ag waste products, and basically anything that we can return to the soil in that way, are good."

But what is good for the land isn't always good for the people who live there.

Horror stories

Many of the residents who live near the site are worried because they have heard horror stories about flies and odor in other places where sugar beet waste has been dumped.

"It does create some concerns, and in some ways it is probably legitimate because there could be some odor associated with it and short-term insect problems," Davidson said. "The people who are spreading the beet tailings need to use some common sense."

Davidson said the odor and insect problems can be greatly reduced if the material is tilled under right away in the spring.

Residents, on the other hand, need to be reasonable because of the importance of the sugar industry to the Red River Valley, Davidson said.

"If we want the industry to continue, we as a community need to figure out how to deal with these issues positively," Davidson said. "There is a whole lot about being a good neighbor involved in this thing."

Hence the difficult decision that has landed in the laps of the Grand Forks County Commission.

Back and forth

Initially, the Grand Forks Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that the commission allow the permit. But the County Commission, after listening to residents in the area who are concerned about odor, flies and traffic, voted against granting the permit.

That vote was followed by another vote to approve the permit, after the commission heard testimony from area cattle producers who were afraid they would no longer be able to have tailings and pulp delivered to them for use as cattle feed.

That vote was followed by a special meeting, at which the special-use permit was tabled until the next regular commission meeting, which is scheduled for 4 p.m. Tuesday in the County Office Building.

Rules and Regulations

One of the issues that residents who are against the special-use permit bring up is that there are no regulations regarding the spreading of sugar beet pulp and tailings on farmland.

According to Steve Tillotson, assistant director of the Division of Waste Management for the North Dakota Health Department, there are not only rules and regulations, but there are also inspections.

The sugar beet companies -- in this case American Crystal -- need to have an approved nutrient management plan, Tillotson said.

"We have an approved nutrient management plan with Crystal; they can use it (sugar beet tailings and pulp) for cattle feed or for land application as fertilizer," he said. "But they can't cause any water pollution, significant odor or attract a large number of flies."

Tillotson said he can't recall any complaints that his office has received about Crystal.

"We have a contract with those people who haul it for us; they must follow these rules and regulations," Smith said. "And along with that, the company has written up a fairly detailed plan that it must follow about how it must dispose of the waste products."

In case of a problem, whoever is disposing of the beet byproducts is required to report it to the company.

American Crystal also does inspections to make sure the people they contract with are doing a good job.

"Mr. Brule is doing a very good job with his sites in Minnesota," Smith said.

Not in my back yard

But residents aren't convinced that the sugar beet tailings and pulp won't smell or attract flies.

Wally Helland, environmental health supervisor for the Grand Forks Public Health Department, which serves both the city and the county, sent a letter to the county Planning and Zoning Commission recommending that the commission not approve Brule's special-use permit because of the potential for odor and fly problems.

"I don't blame the residents for being concerned," Helland said. "And I'm not saying the guy wouldn't do a good job."

Helland said he's had experience with potatoes dumped in the countryside that create odor problems. "So we know the potential is there," he said.

But, he said, his office abides by whatever the commission decides.

Residents are also concerned because there will be an increase in truck traffic near their homes, and they fear for their children's safety.