News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 
Johanns hears ideas on federal Farm Bill
By Sandra Hansen, Ag Editor, Star Herald
May 16, 2011
 

Area farmers blasted the federal Freedom to Farm bill and called for changes in agricultural policy during a forum Friday morning.

Finding a way to improve the agriculture economy for the entire nation, not just the Panhandle, was the challenge issued by participants in a Farm Bill town hall meeting sponsored by Gov. Mike Johanns.

Panhandle farmers, ranchers and agribusiness people presented their ideas during an hour-long session at the UN Panhandle Research and Extension Center.

All agreed that parts of the present legislation should be retained with some modifications, and that other features should be eliminated.

"The Freedom to Farm act is a disaster, and somebody needs to be held accountable," declared Don Hansen, a Hemingford area farmer, during the public comment period. His statement earned applause from the audience.

Of the six panelists and the six individuals who spoke, several noted the necessity of leveling the playing field in international trade agreements, and they all agreed food should not be used as a weapon.

Bolstering commodity prices was also a priority among the participants, who would just as soon do without government payments and live off their own production.

"Were witnessing the demise of American agriculture as we know it," said John Maser, a Minatare area farmer. "Weve lost hope, and no one is optimistic anymore. We need to return profitability to production agriculture."

Maser said he and many other farmers are surviving on government payments. "Were not proud of it, but its a way to survive. We can survive the tough times, but we need a profit once in awhile."

Larry Flohr, a Chappell area wheat and millet farmer, said the current farm legislation failed partly because trade opportunities were not developed.

"I have mixed emotions about why I am here today," he said. "The majority of my income is from payments, but I prefer to live off my own production."

Flohr said an emergency assistance package is needed immediately to keep farmers from going under before a new Farm Bill is written.

Owen Palm, former vice president of Western Sugar and a farmer and agribusinessman, said the current farm program must be changed.

"Beets are not marketable, and the United States is a net importer of sugar and obliged by trade agreements to remain so," he said. "No other commodity faces such a large import requirement. This limits domestic growth."

Allen Bright, a feedlot operator from Antioch, hopes the government will be more vigilant in developing its programs.

He noted the 2000 sugar payment in kind program that reduced the number of harvested sugarbeets. This also reduced the amount of beet pulp available to livestock feeders, making them find a more expensive feed source.

"This was an unintended consequence of the government messing with the market," he said.

Suggestions for the Farm Bill included elimination of embargoes, inventory management, resolution of import issues, maintaining planting flexibility and creating a revenue coverage program.

Johanns said he agrees that an emergency package needs to be developed to carry farmers through until the new Farm Bill is finalized two years from now.

He also recognizes the challenge in helping one area of agriculture without hurting another.

Merlyn Carlson, director of the Nebraska Department of Agriculture, also attended the meeting.

"I think we have some good things coming for agriculture, because were going to level the playing field," he said.