News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 
The Rising cost of farming
Jump in fuel, fertilizer prices will cut into profit margins
By Ann Bailey, The Grand Forks Herald
March 30, 2001
 
Putting in the crop this spring could cost farmers twice as much as it did a year ago, unless they bought fertilizer last fall or locked in the price with their dealers.

The price of anhydrous ammonia, the most popular -- and cheapest -- nitrogen-based fertilizer used by Northern Plains farmers, for example, was about 24 cents per pound or about $400 per ton in mid-March, compared with 12 cents per pound or about $200 a year ago. Because ammonia is used to make other forms of nitrogen fertilizer, the costs of urea and liquid nitrogen are a few cents higher per pound.

The escalating fertilizer prices, coupled with high fuel prices will shrink farmers' profit margins in 2001. For example, a wheat farmer who applies 80 pounds of nitrogen to his field this spring will reduce his per-acre return by $10 per acre.

"Ten dollars an acre is roughly profit, if people are lucky," said Dave Franzen, Extension Service soil specialist at North Dakota State University.

Locking in

Meanwhile, farmers who were able to lock in a lower price last fall are looking at less drastic increases in their input costs. For Thompson, N.D., farmer John Galegher, locking in fertilizer prices is just as much part of the fall routine as harvesting the crops.

Galegher and his cousin and farming partner, Paul Galegher, annually use about 450 tons of a variety of nitrogen-based fertilizers on their 4,000 acres of soybeans, sugar beets, edible beans and potatoes, so locking in the price last fall reduced their fertilizer costs by about $25 to $50 per ton or about $5,000 to $10,000 over this spring's prices, John Galegher estimated.

Even with the savings, though, the Galeghers still paid more for the fertilizer they will use for this spring's crop than they did for their 2000 crop. And even though he has locked in the price, Galegher knows that it's not wise to pay for the fertilizer in the fall and then forget about it over the winter. Farmers may be making a mistake if they assume that paying for the fertilizer in the fall will ensure its delivery in the spring, Galegher cautioned.

"Even if they think they've got the price, the availability may not be there." Galegher said he keeps in contact with his dealer after he's made the purchase to "make sure the fertilizer is there when we need it."

The tight fertilizer supplies will make it necessary for farmers to be flexible about their inputs, Franzen said. For example, a farmer who normally applies anhydrous ammonia, may have to switch to another form of fertilizer if the anhydrous isn't available.

Cutting costs

The high cost of inputs likely will tempt farmers to reduce their fertilizer applications, said NDSU's Franzen.

"I think farmers generally will cut back."

That's OK as long as they are reducing fertilizer applications on crops that won't suffer quality losses or in areas of the field that don't need as much fertilizer as other areas, Franzen said.

For example, farmers may be able to get by with reducing nitrogen applications on crops such as soybeans, corn, barley and sugar beets without sacrificing yields and quality.

Wheat, however, is another story. Nitrogen is needed to raise protein levels of wheat, Franzen said, and reducing the rate will result in a crop that likely won't fetch a premium price at the elevator. Meanwhile, wheat yields also will suffer from cutbacks in nitrogen fertilizer applications.

"Why grow wheat if you're just going to grow junk?" Franzen asked. "Even with fertilizer prices high, it still pays to put nitrogen on most crops. The most important thing is to soil test and make sure you need it." Soil tests, at about $1 per acre, are a good buy considering fertilizer costs are $30 an acre, Franzen said.

Other options

Meanwhile, farmers can reduce their fertilizer costs by taking advantage of the nitrogen that may remain in the soil from the previous year's crops. Crops with heavy foliage such as soybeans, field peas, lentils and sunflowers may leave some nitrogen behind, Franzen said.

Another good source of fertilizer is manure, if it's applied correctly. For the optimum benefit to the soil, manure should be spread as evenly as possible and incorporated within four hours from when it's applied to the field, Franzen advised.

High fertilizer prices won't be the only high input costs farmers will face this year. Diesel fuel prices, while the same as last year, are about 30 to 35 cents per gallon higher than they were at the start of the 1999 season.

The higher costs ate into last year's profit and likely will do the same this year, John Galegher said. During the 2000 farming season, the Galeghers used about 20,000 gallons of diesel fuel in their tractors and trucks during the farming season. With diesel fuel prices of about $1 per gallon or 30 cents more per gallon than during the 1999 season, the Galeghers paid an additional $6,000 in fuel costs in 2000 and it looks like costs will be similar this year.

Despite the high costs of putting in the crop and low commodity prices, John Galegher said he still is looking forward to this farming season.

Like all farmers, Galegher is forced, by virtue of his occupation, to be an eternal optimist.

"If I wasn't optimistic it would get better, I'd quit. It's kind of like cheering for the Minnesota Vikings.

"You hope things will be better next year."

For the Galeghers and farmers across the Northern Plains, next year has arrived.