NEW YORK Hungry for sweeter returns, U.S. candymakers
are moving their operations abroad, where their main raw
material, sugar, is sold at half of the U.S. domestic price.
And although those candymakers won't deny that countries
such as Mexico and Canada also offer more favorable
foreign-exchange rates and cheaper labor, they charge that the
current U.S. sugar policy puts them at a competitive
disadvantage with foreign manufacturers who buy their sugar in
the world market and send the final product into the United
States.
World raw sugar prices are currently at about 8.40 cents a
pound, whereas in the domestic market raw sugar costs 21.50
cents.
John Brooks, president of California-based Adam and Brooks
Inc., said his company has moved some operations to Tijuana,
Mexico, seeking cheaper sugar, although it still has a factory
in Los Angeles. The final products from Mexico are then
shipped back into the United States.
"And we're going to see more of this unless the
government eliminates or changes the sugar policy," said
Brooks, whose company's revenue tops $20 million annually.
"We're actually exporting the candy industry" he
said.
High sugar prices "put American food manufacturers at
a competitive disadvantage," decried George Franklin,
vice president for government affairs at Kellogg Co.
He said that Kellogg hasn't taken operations abroad.
"But when you're going to source different materials to
manufacture sugar-containing products, (the higher U.S. sugar
price) is a factor in deciding" where to go.
Greg McCormack, president of Bob's Candy, a candy
manufacturer based in Albany, Ga., said his company recently
moved a factory it had in Jamaica to Mexico, with the high
sugar prices in the United States putting it out of the
running. Bob's Candy's annual sales are close to $40 million.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, out of the
3.3 billion pounds of non-chocolate candy consumed in the
United States in 1999, about 17 percent was manufactured
abroad. That was up from 13.7 percent in 1998 and 11.7 percent
in 1997.
The high price of U.S. sugar the result of price
supports and tariffs and quotas on foreign imports is also
costing U.S. jobs, says the Candy Institute, a Chicago-based
economic and community development group, whose financial
sponsors include the U.S. Department of Commerce.
On its Website, the institute notes that the decision by
Brach Confectionery Co., one of the largest candymakers in the
United States, to relocate its production to Mexico or
Argentina because of high domestic sugar prices and its aging
facilities, will result in the loss of 1,500 jobs.
At the American Sugar Alliance, a Washington-based umbrella
group that represents sugar cane and beet growers, chairman
Luther Markwart said candymakers complain about sugar policy
to disguise their quest for better foreign exchange rates and
cheaper labor.
Companies "can pay Mexican wages which are about
one-tenth of United States' or take advantage of the
weaker currencies," Markwart said. "Usually you
don't move your businesses based on one input commodity,"
he said. "Maybe they do it in the diamond business, but
with sugar-containing products you're looking at other
factors," he said.
The ASA also argues that while U.S. raw sugar cane and
refined sugar prices fell nearly 15 percent and 29 percent,
respectively, between 1996 and 2000, the price for candy rose
8 percent, cookies 8 percent and ice cream 14 percent. The
accumulated U.S. consumer price index over that stretch rose
17.4 percent.
It's widely recognized that U.S. sugar policy needs
adjustment even by the ASA. Import barriers haven't
prevented domestic prices from slipping on plentiful supplies,
but they remain well above world's prices. As a result,
several refineries have been shut down or are up for sale.
Defaults on government loans to farmers have left the
government holding a large stockpile of sugar. The domestic
market also faces the opening of trade to Mexican sugar under
the North American Free Trade Agreement. |