News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 
Sugar farmer tells congressmen: big users not passing lower sugar prices to consumers
Press release by the American Sugar Alliance
April 26, 2001
 
WASHINGTON, April 26 /PRNewswire/ -- Members of the House Agriculture Committee got documented evidence today of how devastatingly lower sugar prices for farmers have not been passed on to consumers by the big food manufacturers, candy makers, grocers, and others.

Ray VanDriessche, a farmer from Bay City, Michigan, and president of the American Sugarbeet Growers Association, testified before the committee, as it begins deliberation on the 2002 Farm Bill. VanDriessche presented a chart and graph in his written testimony that gave dramatic figures on loss of income by farmers as prices plummeted, while big commercial sugar users continued to raise their prices to consumers.

Citing figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, VanDriessche related that projected total cane refiner and beet processor losses from lower wholesale prices amounted to $3.66 billion since 1996.

None of the savings of the lower wholesale sugar prices has been passed along to consumers, he noted. Because grocers have raised retail prices for sugar and food manufacturers have raised retail prices for sugar-containing products, consumers have lost $1.65 billion during this period, he told the lawmakers.

The bottom line, VanDriessche said, is that grocery and food manufacturers, coupling the lower wholesale price they have paid and the higher prices they have charged consumers, have added a whopping $5.31 billion to their profit picture.

VanDriessche said, ``While wholesale refined sugar prices during 1997-2001 have averaged nearly 4 cents per pound less than in 1996, grocers have charged an average of almost 2 cents per pound more for refined sugar during this same period. At the same time, food manufacturers have boosted the prices they charge for highly sweetened products, such as candy, cereal, ice cream and baked goods, by from 4 to 14 percent.''

VanDriessche also noted that, to add insult to injury, it is these same big grocers and commercial users of sugar that want to eliminate the last vestiges of a safety net U.S. farmers have under sugar policy.