TWIN FALLS -- 2002: Agriculture was
supposed to be solidly positioned on the road to health and
profitability, with an outdated support system left lying in
the dust. That was the plan of the 1996 Freedom to Farm Act, a
policy grounded in open-market philosophies and free trade and
intended, most of all, to loose of the binds of government
intervention.
So what happened?
"I guess first and foremost, the
hardest part of public policy is that no one has a crystal
ball," said Sara Braasch, executive director of the Idaho
Cattlemen's Association.
And she would know. Before her ICA post,
Braasch was the legislative assistant for agriculture to Idaho
Sen. Larry Craig and was involved in the writing of most of
the 1996 Farm Bill.
"The intention across the board was
good. After that there were a number of situations ... no one
saw coming," such as the economic collapse of Asia, a
major trading partner, Braasch said.
Another major deterrent to the farm
bill's success in restructuring American agriculture is that
integral components of the overhaul were grounded in tax and
trade issues that are outside the jurisdiction of the
congressional ag committee, she said. A new road would have to
include tax relief, expansion into new export markets and
enforcement of trade agreements.
While promised, many contend, those
things didn't happen. Yet there were also problems in the farm
bill itself, they say.
Murtaugh pork producer Dave Roper,
president elect of the National Pork Producers Council, said
inequity between commodities was the biggest problem with the
last farm bill.
"The whole farm bill was a little
bit wrong," he said. "There needs to be more equity
between livestock and crops. It seems like the crop side has
faired a little better. I'm in both," he said, adding
that he raises barley, potatoes and corn in addition to pork,
"but I realize the inequity."
"You can't let one group get the
lion's share of money. Corn and soybeans (big Midwest crops)
get the lion's share, but that doesn't do us any good in
Idaho," he said. "It needs to be more equitable in
order to be a fair system. It has to be. It's like going to
the store and only focusing on one thing."
To Roper's way of thinking, however, a
farm bill is less about money and more about good policy.
"Some people's focus is that it's
just a fight for (monetary) support for a certain commodity. A
lot have based their survivability on this price support, have
become addicted and can't do without it," he said.
"But you want a farm bill to correct a problem and not go
back year after year and have to fix the problem.
"Most people are looking at money,
but I'm far more concerned with policy. The money always runs
out while the hands are still out there," he said.
"The policy side, to me, is 75 percent, and the funding
side is 25 percent. The policy is what drives the other
side."
Steve Johnson, executive director of the
Idaho Grain Growers Association, agrees, but that's not
stopping the National Association of Grain Growers from going
after some monetary guarantees. The group is proposing a plan
that includes a fixed payment, and adjustment in the loan rate
and a counter cyclical payment that would kick in only when
needed.
"Basically what it's trying to do
is guarantee a $4.25 (per-bushel) price," Johnson said.
While grain growers as a whole were on
board with the Freedom to Farm plan to end fixed payments by
2002, the past five years have caused growers -- in grain and
other commodity circles as well -- to rethink the plan,
Johnson said.
"What you'll hear from most folks
is that there was a legitimate attempt and sincere effort on
everyone's part, but you're just not going to be able to
sustain agriculture without support for the basic commodities.
"If you support the basic
commodities, needs of U.S. consumers, other crops will fall
into place and make money for those farmers," he said,
adding that price assurance on a handful of basic crops will
spur processors of other commodities to entice farmers to
plant what they need. "It makes all the other crops
compete for acres, and you have a healthy economy."
But that is just one philosophy in the
fray. The House Ag Committee is in the throes of hearing after
hearing to grant all of agriculture a shot at the new farm
bill.
Braasch knows that arduous process
firsthand.
"It's not going to be easy coming
up with a new farm bill," she said, adding that the
lessons learned from last farm bill will help. "There's
something to be learned from every bill. Experience is the
best teacher."
Roper, who has just returned from the
pork industry's day on Capitol Hill, said whatever happens
won't happen quickly.
"I don't even know if the war lines
are going to be drawn by the end of this year," he said.
"It'll probably be one of the most significant battles
the administration and Congress have had to deal with. It's
not going to be pretty." |