Sugar beets are becoming evident in
this field near Kimberly, but late planting and replants
accounted for 15 percent of the Magic Valley crop this
year. Production challenges elsewhere as well could have
an beneficial effect on prices.
Carol Ryan Dumas/AG WEEKLY |
TWIN FALLS -- While nobody likes to see a wreck in the
field, early-season challenges just might prove to be the best
thing that could happen to the sugar beet industry.
Against a backdrop of sugar mountains sitting idly in
warehouses, most growers set out this spring to fulfill their
contracts and plant as usual. But Mother Nature had a
different idea.
Intermittent rains and major flooding in the Red River
Valley and frosts and crusting here in the Magic Valley
changed the game plan. Acres are down, and those that did get
planted are behind schedule.
That could make for a better market, according to Luther
Markwart, executive vice president of the American Sugarbeet
Growers Association.
"I think they're (markets are) going to be stronger
because, obviously, production is not going to be what it
was."
I addition, about 25,000 acres will not be planted in the
Moses Lake area this year, due to failure of the Columbia
River Sugar Co. there.
"Things are looking better (marketwise),"
Markwart said. "But how fast and how dramatic the turn
depends on our ability to pick sugar out of the CCC (Commodity
Credit Corp.) and how the crop develops."
Referring to forfeitures last season wherein sugar
processors forfeited sugar back to the CCC in lieu of payment
on their operating loans, Markwart said there is 793,000 tons
of raw stock that is weighing heavily on the market.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has just announced that
it will sell 100,000 tons of that surplus to ready buyers in
the Upper Midwest for ethanol production, but that still
leaves nearly 700,000 tons on hand.
"That's still a good amount," he said, adding
that national production of beet sugar is about 4. 4 million
tons, and production of all sugar is about $8.5 million tons.
Depending on how the crop goes, some of that excess could
be sold back to the market, he said, and it's hoped that there
will be other avenues for dispersing the rest. One option is
another payment in kind program, which was used last year,
wherein growers are paid to not harvest their crop.
But much is going to depend on this year's crop, he said.
Leonard Kerbs, Twin Falls district ag manager for
Amalgamated Sugar Co., agrees, even though more than 15
percent of Magic Valley acres were planted late or replanted
and the crop is 10 to 14 days behind schedule.
"With a higher-than-normal replant of the crop, it's
logical to say production could be down. But there have been
some years where you have a slow start and (growing)
conditions are such that you catch up and have a normal
crop," he said.
Either way, Amalgamated President Larry Corry doesn't look
for a shortfall here to have a significant effect on the big
picture.
"Our crop wouldn't make a big difference in the
overall scheme of things," he said, adding that
Amalgamated's piece of the pie represents about 10 percent of
all the sugar sold in the United States. "But if there
were a shortfall everywhere, that could make a
difference."
The stakes are a bit higher in the Red River Valley of
North Dakota and Minnesota, where 13 percent of the
national production is grown. American Crystal Sugar Co.
had to do some fancy footwork to even get a crop in the
ground.
"We certainly had a delay in our 498,500 acres,"
said Jeff Schweitzer, public relations officer for the
company.
Optimum planting time for better-than-normal yields is the
last week of April to the first week of May. After May 15,
growers can expect less-than-average yields, he said. As of
Wednesday, 482,000 acres were planted, but they are a good
month behind that optimum planting window and lacking more
than 16,000 acres at full throttle.
"If acres are not planted and processed, we'll
eventually see what that turns out to be; however, the impact
of those areas not planted will not be known 'til
harvest," Schweitzer said.
As for those that were planted late, the big unknown is
what Mother Nature will dish out.
"Sugar company expectations are, we're going to have
average to below-average tonnage," Schweitzer said.
"But, depending on sugar tonnage, it's too early to tell.
The hope is we're going to have an excellent growing
season."
Markwart said issues other than domestic production are
taking their toll on the market, as well. The stuffed molasses
issue with Canada and a quota discrepancy with Mexico are
major factors in the overall picture.
"Once those things are fixed, that will send a strong
message to the market," he said, adding that he is
optimistic those fixes will come this year.
-----------
Sugar supply estimates
2000-2001
Beginning stocks 2.2 million tons
Production 8.5 million tons
Beet sugar 4.4 million tons
Cane sugar 4.1 million tons
Imports 1.7 million tons
TRQ 1.25 million tons
Other .45 million tons
Total supply 12.4 million tons
* source USDA WASDE May report
2001 sugar beet
planting intentions
Idaho 203,000 acres
U.S. 1.43 million acres
* Source USDA NASS March report |