WASHINGTON (AP) A draft negotiating text for an
agreement to create a hemisphere-wide free trade zone is
drawing heavy criticism from opponents who contend it confirms
their worst fears about the damage the trade pact would do to
the environment and labor rights.
The 434-page draft of the agreement was posted Wednesday on
the Web site of the Free Trade Area of the Americas
secretariat.
In a statement, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick
called the release of the negotiating text an unprecedented
effort to make international trade and its economic and social
benefits understandable to the public.
President Bush and leaders of the 33 other nations involved
in the negotiations had pledged at an April summit meeting in
Quebec to make the negotiating document public after thousands
of anti-globalization demonstrators had protested in the
streets over what they called seven years of secret
negotiations.
Critics said their initial look at the documents on Tuesday
did not allay their concerns that environmental and labor
rights were being sacrificed in the pursuit of free trade.
Under this anti-environmental, antidemocratic trade
agreement, multinational investors will have the right to sue
governments and challenge environmental laws and regulations
before secret and unaccountable international tribunals,
said Brent Blackwelder, president of Friends of the Earth.
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizens Global Trade
Watch, said that the heavily bracketed text, indicating
language still in dispute, showed how little progress
negotiators have been able to make despite seven years of
effort. None of the brackets indicated which country was
backing which position in the disputed portions of the text.
Wallach questioned whether the full negotiating text was
being released given that the North American Free Trade
Agreement, which covered the United States, Mexico and Canada,
was over 700 pages long.
This was supposed to be a PR move aimed at calming FTAA
opposition, but the governments have obviously put out a
fragment of the total agreement, one that has been sanitized
by eliminating vital information, she said.
But U.S. officials insisted that the text that was released
is the official negotiating text. They blamed the delay on the
need to translate the document into the four FTAA official
languages English, Spanish, French and Portuguese.
Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, a critic of the administrations
trade policies, said he was troubled by the contents of the
draft text and the delay in releasing the document. He and 53
other Democrats in Congress had called on the administration
to make the document public in March, well before the Quebec
summit.
The Bush administration has shown only minimal interest
in addressing either the impact of trade on environmental and
labor standards or in assuring a reasonable level of
transparency and public participation in trade
decision-making, Doggett said.
The goal of negotiators is to wrap up discussion in time
for the free trade area to go into effect in 2005. But the
many brackets in the agreement language underscore how much
ground negotiators have to cover to achieve that goal.
The United States is hoping the deal will eliminate Latin
Americas high tariffs on American manufactured goods.
Brazil, the largest economy in South America, is insisting
that the United States reduce its farm subsidies and
antidumping rules, which keep out Brazilian products such as
steel, sugar and orange juice. |