Washington, D.C. The National Family Farm Coalition (NFFC),
along with 60 state, regional and national organizations,
delivered a letter Wednesday to every member of the House of
Representatives strongly opposing legislation that would grant
Fast Track trade authority to President Bush to negotiate a
trade agreement known as the Free Trade Areas of the
America that would expand the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) to the rest of the hemisphere. President
Bush and the Republican House leaders are pushing hard to win
approval of the bill before Congress adjourns for the August
recess next week.
Seven Montana-based organizations signed the letter:
Northern Plains Resource Council; Montana Farmers Union;
R-CALF, United Stockgrowers of America; Intertribal
Agriculture Council; Montana Chapter of the National Farmers
Organization; Campaign to Reclaim Rural America; Alternative
Energy Resources Organization; Montana Community Labor
Alliance and the Western Organization of Resource Councils.
The NAFTA trade model has failed family farmers and
ranchers and has devastated rural America, said Dena Hoff,
a farmer from Glendive, who chairs both the Montana-based
Northern Plains Resource Council and the NFFC Trade Task
Force. Inadequate border inspections, commodity dumping,
price manipulation, and devastatingly low commodity prices for
farmers are just some of the casualties of the failed
agricultural and trade polices embodied by NAFTA, the WTO and
the Freedom to Farm Act. Congress and the President must focus
on addressing the many failures of NAFTA instead of expanding
this economic, social and environmental disaster to the rest
of the Western Hemisphere.
Putting all the decision-making power for trade deals
into the hands of the President is unconstitutional, because
it circumvents the democratic process we promote to citizens
and governments in the rest of the world, said Hoff.
What kind of an example of democracy are we setting?
Hoff said the letter puts forth fair trade principles for
agriculture that, if followed, would begin to reverse the
severe agricultural depression inflicted on rural America for
the past decade by failed agricultural and trade policies.
Labor and environmental groups have already put forth their
alternative principles for fair trade, she said. This
letter marks the culmination of efforts by hundreds of
thousands of grassroots rural activists from across the
country to place agriculture on equal footing with labor and
the environment in the context of the current trade debate.
The following are the agricultural and food security
principles outlined in the letter:
Allow countries to prioritize sustaining family farms
and global food security.
Allow for vigorous enforcement of antitrust laws at the
local, regional, national and international levels to
guarantee competitive markets for family farmers, and a
strengthening of these laws when necessary.
Allow countries to establish domestic and global
reserves, manage supply, enforce anti-dumping laws, and ensure
fair market prices.
Respect the consumers right to know that their food
has been produced in a sustainable manner by advocating
labeling and other approaches.
Allow countries to ensure the production and
distribution of a safe, affordable, and abundant food supply
to meet their domestic needs and achieve food security.
The letter also cites the following negative impacts on
farmers and rural communities since NAFTA was negotiated in
1994:
The overall agricultural trade surplus has declined
from $22.5 billion per year to $12.6 billion in 2000, a 47
percent decrease.
Corn, wheat, and cotton export volumes have decreased
between 11 percent and 28 percent since NAFTA. Farm prices
received by farmers for these crops have declined between 20
percent and 38 percent. Despite a 16 percent increase in
soybean exports, the 15 percent drop in farm prices has
created a net loss of 2 percent in the value of the U.S.
soybean market.
Fruits and vegetables have been especially hard hit
since NAFTA due to imports that displace the domestic market.
Trade deficits more than doubled and the frozen fruit sector
went from a $9 million trade surplus in 1995 to a $37 million
deficit in 1999. The expansion to 31 other countries as part
of the FTAA will further exacerbate this situation.
The $416 million dairy trade deficit has climbed to
$796 million and a $21 million beef surplus is now a $152
million deficit.
The impact of NAFTA and other free trade agreements is
reflected in the ongoing farm crisis gripping the nation, and
the billions of taxpayer dollars appropriated to programs
created by Congress and implemented by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to help alleviate the economic devastation
caused by the failures of our export-driven farm policy,
Hoff said. |