In only a few days or weeks, farmers who grow
corn, soybeans, wheat and other "program crops" will
be getting their share of a $5.5 billion emergency aid package
recently approved by Congress this summer. These are the extra
"AMTA" (Agricultural Market Transition Act) checks
that have gone out for the past four years.
If you get a check or electronic bank deposit, spend it
wisely. It could be your last one.
That's the reaction of some congressional staffers to
today's "Midsession Review" from the White House
Office of Management and Budget. OMB's latest projection for
government spending and tax receipts virtually wipes out the
surplus that was to be used for agricultural spending. It
doesn't affect this year's emergency spending. That comes out
of the current fiscal year and the checks are being cut. But
it's likely to make the job of writing the next farm bill very
difficult.
"This could very well bring things to a full
stop," says a well-placed Senate staffer. "That
entire $66 billion in additional money for the next farm bill
is now completely up in the air." (The $66 billion would
be spent between the federal fiscal years 2003 and 20011.)
That is the money that virtually all farm group lobbyists
in Washington, from Farm Bureau to Farmers Union, spent months
getting added to the "baseline" used by Congress as
a guide to farm spending. The groups had sought some $12
billion a year in additional funding. Congress approved about
$6.6 billion a year for the next 10 years.
Surplus estimate shrinks
The Office of Management and Budget still projects that the
current federal budget surplus will be the second largest in
history -- $158 billion. But that's $123 billion smaller than
its estimate last April. That leaves only about $1 billion
over the excess Social Security payments, which the
Administration has pledged not to touch. OMB projects a
useable surplus of only about $2 billion for all federal
programs in fiscal year 2003, when the next farm bill would
take effect. The smaller surplus is due in part to the weak
economy.
The bottom line, says the Senate staffer, is that there
would be no extra money for the "counter-cyclical"
payments the House Agriculture Committee has approved, and
there would be no extra money for the new Conservation
Security Act payments that Senate Agriculture Committee chair
Tom Harkin would like to add into the next farm bill. That
assumes that the current law would continue, which would
include the regular 2002 AMTA payments under current farm law
and current conservation programs.
Next week the Congressional Budget Office will release its
own budget and income projections, and many in Congress expect
those to be even more pessimistic. The House will also vote
soon on the farm bill passed by the House Ag Committee.
In theory, the House could ignore an agreement with the
White House and OMB to not touch Medicare spending and go
ahead and approve the additional farm bill spending. Only one
thing is certain, writing the next farm bill just got a lot
harder. |