Editor's Note: Organic farming has been
championed by some as the savior of our environment and the
way to produce healthy food without the use of pesticides.
Alex Avery of the Center of Global Food Issues has published
an enlightening paper titled "Nature's Toxic Tools: The
Organic Myth of Pesticide-Free Farming." In this month's
column, I will summarize some of the highlights in Avery's
paper.
Organic Does Not Mean "Pesticide-Free". It is a
common misperception that organic farming is pesticide-free.
When, in fact, organic farmers are allowed to use a number of
toxic pesticides. While organic farmers promote non-chemical
pest control measures, such as crop rotation and beneficial
insects, they still use chemical pesticides when pests
threaten their crops. This fact is especially noteworthy since
most organic farmers receive a premium for their organically
grown produce.
The fundamental difference between organic and synthetic
pesticides is not their toxicity, but their origin, that is,
whether they are extracted from natural plant, insects, or
mineral ores or are chemically synthesized. Frequently, some
organic pesticides such as commonly used nicotine have
mammalian tonicities that are far higher than some synthetic
pesticides. Nicotine, for example, has a rat LD50 of 55 mg/kg
as compared to the newest synthetic insecticide, imidacloprid
that has a rat LD50 of 425 mg/kg. This makes nicotine 10 times
more toxic than the newest synthetic insecticide.
The toxin from Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) is the most used
pesticide on organic farms while over all oil, sulfur, and
copper combined accounted for 25% of U. S. pesticide use
including organic and non-organic farming (1997). A number of
additional organic pesticides, including botanical extracts
such as pyrethrum, neem, sabadilla, and rotenone are used.
According to Alex Avery, government authorities have no
statistics at all on the use of any organic pesticides other
than oil, sulfur Bt and copper even though millions of pounds
are used every year. Avery contends that this is
"somewhat puzzling because many organic pesticides are
used more intensively than non-organic pesticides. This is due
to the lower effectiveness of organic pesticides compared to
there synthetic counterparts."
Two organic-approved pesticides alone account for 23% of
all U.S. agricultural pesticide use in 1997, with oil
accounting for 56% of all 'insecticides' and sulfur accounting
for 59% of all 'fungicides'.
Sulfur and copper are the two heaviest used fungicides and
are applied at significantly higher rates of active ingredient
than synthetic fungicides. Nearly 78 million pounds of sulfur
was used on 2.2 million acres, an average of 34 pounds per
acre. Copper was used to treat 3.3 million acres with 13.7
million pounds or over 4 pounds per acre. These uses are
contrasted with 40 million pounds of synthetic fungicides
applied to 25 million acres or only 1.58 pounds per acre (1997
data).
What if the U.S. shifted to 100% organic? Because of the
lack of statistics, it is impossible to accurately estimate
the increase in the use of organic pesticides under an
all-organic scenario. Avery provided several plausible
paradigms under which pesticide use would skyrocket. Since the
use of Bt as a replacement for synthetic insecticides is
limited by a very narrow range of crop pests, millions of
pound of oil or other organic insecticides, such as pyrethrum,
neem, rotenone, or sabadilla, would need to be used. Oil is
currently used at an average rate of 49 pounds per acre as
compared to 1-4 pounds per acre for a typical synthetic
insecticide. Newer synthetic insecticides, such as
imidacloprid, have average per acre use rates of less than 0.5
pounds per acre. Because organic insecticides are less
effective and degrade more rapidly than their synthetic
counterparts, organic insecticides also would need to be used
more frequently to achieve the same level of control. The
increase in fungicide use that could be expected with a
conversion to all organic can be estimated by replacing
synthetic fungicides with copper or sulfur. In 1997, sulfur
was applied at an average rate of 34.8 lbs. per acre-a rate 22
times higher than the average synthetic fungicide rate or 1.58
lbs. Thus a replacement of all synthetic fungicides with
sulfur would require an additional 840 million lbs. (a 738%
increase). Copper was applied at an average rate of 4.08 lbs.
per acre in 1997, which is 2.5 times higher than the average
synthetic fungicide rate. Replacement of synthetics with
copper would require a 47% increase in overall fungicide use.
Use of copper would than total 116 million pounds as compared
with 40 million pounds of synthetic fungicides now used. These
examples serve to illustrate the greater use intensity needed
for organic pesticides. Furthermore, sulfur and copper are far
more persistent in the environment than their synthetic
counterparts.
Weeds are the oldest and most persistent problem in
agriculture. Herbicides are the least toxic class of
pesticides and offer most environmental benefit. Typically
herbicides narrowly target plant enzymes and are virtually
harmless to insects and mammals. The proven benefits,
including less tillage and erosion, are enormous. An
all-organic mandate would eliminate all these benefits.
Conclusion
Factual evidence as presented in Alex Avery's recent paper,
and outlined in this column, suggests that a major shift to
organic agriculture would mean more pesticide use, not less;
more toxicity, not less: and higher pressure on natural
resources without commensurate offsetting benefits. |