News & Events - Archived News

[ Up ]
 
Molasses imports not stopped yet
  Sugar industry awaits appeals court decision
By Mikkel Pates, Agweek Staff Writer
September 11, 2001
 

FARGO, N.D. -- It's too say how soon to a favorable court ruling on "stuffed molasses" shipments into the United States will affect imports and prices, a beet sugar official says.

Luther Markwart, executive vice president of the American Sugarbeet Growers Association in Washington, says a recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington will lead to a U.S. Customs decision on when to stop the sugary syrup from coming into the country. A legislative fix still is needed, he says.

U.S. sugar producers had fought the imports as a sham that allowed a company to import sugar from Canada outside of tariff rate quotas. The 100,000 tons of imports is an amount equal to about 50,000 acres of beet production, but has a bigger effect on the market because it creates price leverage for buyers.

"Usually they'll give companies a certain amount of time to cease those operations," Markwart says.

In the courts

The appeals court overturned a lower court decision that should stop a "stuffed molasses" scheme that had allowed Canadian sugar into the United States outside of tariff rate quotas.

The appeals court found that "what's been going on here is nothing but a sham and a charade and it ought to stop," Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. commented in a Budget Committee field hearing in Fargo, N.D., in which farm leaders testified on the 2001 farm bill. Conrad says he is "very heartened" by the ruling and hopes it would further stand.

"If countries can start to engage in this kind of Mickey Mouse -- creating a product that doesn't exist, calling it stuffed molasses, bringing it into the United States, reconstituting it here, making it a sugar product, which it was all along -- (then) everything is fair game.

"If there are no rules in this international trading environment, then we can start to play games, too."

The case

The case, Heartland By-Products Inc. v. the U.S. Department of Agriculture, originally was designed to stop the U.S. Customs Service from keeping making "stuffed molasses" or "sugar syrup" and importing it from Canada.

Since 1997, Heartland brought the sugar syrup into the United States and extracted sugar from it, adding to U.S. oversupplies that have contributed to 22-year lows in the sugar market. The product then was re-exported, re-stuffed and then re-imported. U.S. Customs proposed to stop the process in June 1999, describing it as a "disguise or artifice" to escape the duty. That September, Heartland filed for a preliminary injunction, and the trade court eventually ruled in favor of Heartland.

A U.S. Court of International Trade found in favor of Heartland and the decision was appealed by USDA and the U.S. Beet Sugar Association. The appeals court ruled that the original Customs ruling was "logical andwell-reasoned."

Markwart and Mark Weber, executive director of the Red River Valley Sugarbeet Growers Association in Fargo, say the decision may help speed passage of the Breaux-Craig bill, which has been languishing in the Senate for nearly two years. The bill is broader than just stuffed molasses and would include other products rather than the specific category.

Markwart speculates that Heartland or others already may be looking at a different product to replace stuffed molasses, but adds, "We're getting a sense in the marketplace that their customers are beginning to scatter, meaning there isn't a lot of confidence in the source of supply."